Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-03-21 06:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #3730 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3730 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Movie: 8Uppers, Actor/Singer: Nishikido Ryo]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Psych, Shawn/Jules]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Gentlemen Prefer Blondes]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Yuri on Ice]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Irish comedian Ed Byrne and the Great British Bake Off]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Pokemon B/W]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Overwatch]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #533.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Inspired by #4
(Anonymous) 2017-03-21 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)The female friends on FRIENDS were also great about this - the series had plenty of contrived love triangle scenarios, and the friends could be rather horrible, but one of the things I liked about the show was that Monica, Phoebe and Rachel seemed to legitimately love one another. There's even an episode in the first season where Rachel's boyfriend hits on Phoebe, and Rachel gets mad at the boyfriend, not Phoebe. (Nor is Phoebe remotely tempted to reciprocate.)
SA - meant to add...
(Anonymous) 2017-03-21 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)1. It's easier to write love triangles that way, and people seem to love writing love triangles.
2. Hollywood is still stuck in the mindset that female character arcs have to be romance-based. (Although it's getting better.)
3. I think writers see female friendships as complex and difficult to write. Whereas a frenemyship or rivalry is seemingly easier. (I'm not sure that's true IRL, though.)
Re: SA - meant to add...
(Anonymous) 2017-03-21 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)Re: SA - meant to add...
(Anonymous) 2017-03-21 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)And isn't that fucked up. :/
Re: SA - meant to add...
(Anonymous) 2017-03-21 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)