[ SECRET POST #3767 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3767 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[HBO's Silicon Valley]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Princess Nightmare]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Little Witch Academia]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Broadchurch, Mark Latimer]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #538.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Tagging question

[(Anonymous)]

I'd tag for it because it may not be a trigger per-se, but it's so commonly accepted that pairing fic is romantic or is becoming romantic. If someone tagged something as a pairing fic and it was about said pairing breaking up with absolutely no indications of it being breakup fic I'd assume they were trolling hard.

Honestly this mentality that tags are only for triggers and actually harmful stuff is really annoying and stupid. Like you don't have to 'trigger warn' me that your fic is Leia/Han Solo, but if you don't tag it then people looking for Leia and Han Solo are going to be very disappointed. And it leads to the mentality that people shouldn't warn for stuff like mpreg because being triggered by men getting pregnant is transphobic and it's good to trigger transphobes.