Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-05-08 06:29 pm
[ SECRET POST #3778 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3778 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #541.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 05:02 pm (UTC)(link)Have I occasionally seen stuff that's been "What if Character was a quadruple amputee who's also blind and has an eating disorder and depression, read about his beautiful suffering." and gone ".... time to work on my fic where Character is happy." ? Of course! But no one else needs to know about it. It certainly doesn't make me more moral or better than anyone.
I think the root of the problem is that with the new 'SJW' buzzswords getting flung at fic there's more of a tendency to frame what you like as more moral and Good, and what other people like as immoral and Wrong. Which is as old as fandom, my AU is creative and inspired, your canon-compliant is unimaginative and boring. Your AU is lazy, my canon-compliant is skillful. Your rivalship is unbelievable, my friends-to-lovers is more IC, your friends-to-lovers is boring my rivalship is exciting. It's just, I think, for a lot of people it's easier to shake off the accusations on if their fandom preferences are boring than if they're framed as morally wrong. Most nerds are used to shaking off being called weird by their peers, but being told they're sinners tends to come from authority figures.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)I cannot understand what is so incomprehensible about their response.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)AYRT writes fluff because their fandom has too much angst, but they think it would be rude to actually complain about there being too much angst in their fandom, as the fic author in OP's screencap has done. They think that people in fandom today don't consider such a complaint rude, because they have grown used to framing their likes as being more moral, rather than superior for other reasons. In today's fannish culture, it's not considered crass to openly complain about how much you hate a trend in your fandom, so long as you frame the trend as being immoral/problematic rather than simply annoying to you personally.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-10 07:35 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(As to extremes you snark at anon ... I just noticed last words as brain blanked them as I rock at reading)
Also ... teen-me fancied those patronising overtly intellectual types insisting they don't know anything about popular culture. Afterwards, really liked the total opposite which was as nice - and, that's just ... as wide spread in fandom. You said it better, I ramble.