fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3789 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3789 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

[The White Princess]

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04. [SPOILERS for Guardians of the Galaxy 2]

__________________________________________________

05. [SPOILERS for The Sexy Brutale]

__________________________________________________

06. [SPOILERS for Samurai Jack]

__________________________________________________

07. [SPOILERS for Bates Motel]

__________________________________________________

08. [WARNING for acrotomophilia, bestiality]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #542.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

There's a years-long argument as to whether or not a cable car should be built on the local mountain. Most of the arguments for run along the lines of, 'It'll attract tourists!'* or 'Sometimes the road to the top is closed, I should be able to go up every day!'** or good old 'Don't impede business and progress, you wowser!'***
I'm pretty firmly in camp Do Not, especially since the most recent flare up is from a group complaining that the city council won't approve their plans - to which the council has replied 'You haven't submitted any'. These tossers want their plans approved without even a pretense at oversight.
>:(

* Past experience with things built to attract tourists is that no, it won't.
** There are maybe three days a year when the road is closed and the weather isn't colder than a witch's tit and windy enough to take you from mountain to river direct route.
*** I Do What I Want [With Legal Backing]

[ SECRET POST #3789 ]

Re: Ridiculous local controversies