[ SECRET POST #3794 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3794 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #543.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Too tired to be much entertainment tonight

[(Anonymous)]

You're completely right, but the point here is that there's no evidence a little alcohol does anything to babies. The only proven correlation is heavy regular drinking (lots of nights passed out drunk kind of deal). If there's not any evidence of something, why are we shrieking at pregnant women?

I agree that the baby's needs and safety are the most important, but scaremongering or shaming pregnant women for doing things there's no evidence of is pretty nuts.

Re: Too tired to be much entertainment tonight

[soldatsasha]

That actually isn't true, though. I know the article makes it out that way, but there's been a lot of research done that shows the exact opposite, hence why many health groups (including those run by women) say that it's best to not drink at all. There is no consensus on whether or not it's safe, or how much is safe, so the best course is to avoid alcohol.

There's been lots of research into how random FAS can be, it can take one episode of binge drinking for an otherwise sober mother to cause it, it can accumulate over time, or it can not happen at all even if the mother is downing a jug of vodka every day. There's also certain periods of development where the fetus is incredibly vulnerable to alcohol and other drugs. And there's periods of development where the fetus isn't vulnerable and drinking even heavily is probably totally fine, but that really isn't a gamble to take with a child's life.

Calling it "scaremongering" is imo pretty bullshit, since there's no way of a woman knowing how much is safe for her to drink. It's like saying vaccine advocacy is "scaremongering", since not everyone who isn't vaccinated get's polio. And "shaming?" Exposing a child to the possibility of getting a 100% avoidable disease is absolutely shame-worthy.

Re: Too tired to be much entertainment tonight

[thewakokid]

The trouble is that the reason there is no causal evidence - as opposed to correlational evidence which we have in spades - is that to get that causal evidence you would need to perform experiments which are by any measure utterly monstrous. No were in the world would anyone sanction an experiment so purposefully introduce varying levels of alcohol into an unborn baby.

Re: Too tired to be much entertainment tonight

[(Anonymous)]

So the sensible public health decision is to advise no alcohol during pregnancy.

Re: Too tired to be much entertainment tonight

[thewakokid]

Broadly speaking thats where i stand, i mean for the most part. The current advice isn't No alcohol, its to consume only a tiny quantity of it, which they are working on the assumption will be fine. Its still a risk, but the people working the data deem it an insignificant risk, which I have no choice but to tale them at their word, they are working with facts that I don't have. What I refuse to take at its word is the idea that the facts we have ain't solid enough to justify health advice, and never will be, so we should discard any health advice that makes people feel bad.