case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-05-25 08:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #3795 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3795 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 10 secrets from Secret Submission Post #543.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-26 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
There's more evidence that Amber Heard is an IRL Amy Dunne than Johnny Depp is abusive.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-26 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
1/10

(Anonymous) 2017-05-26 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
It's weird how none of that evidence actually exists, though.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-26 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
No evidence of physical abuse exists per the police but you're still accepting it as gospel

(Anonymous) 2017-05-26 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
Several things wrong with your statement.

First, your assertion that I am "accepting it as gospel". I am actually taking issue with your previous comment that "There's more evidence that Amber Heard is an IRL Amy Dunne than Johnny Depp is abusive." I made no statement as to it being gospel, that I believe every last detail fought out in the tabloids between the two. I did state that there was no evidence to your claim that she's "IRL Amy Dunne", presumably framing some poor innocent sap.

If you're postulating that there is NO evidence of physical abuse, and there is MORE evidence that Amber Heard is Amy Dunne, then presumably you have SOME evidence. I'm certainly interested to hear it.

As per the "no evidence of physical abuse exists per the police", the police have a long and spotty record with domestic abuse cases. At the time they were called, they didn't find evidence to file criminal charges. It is unfortunate that most domestic abuse situations don't unfold in front of the police, because it would certainly be more convenient. And it's annoying that bruises don't always appear immediately.

You can, however, see a video with some emotional abuse if you Google it. It's easy enough to find.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-26 04:29 am (UTC)(link)
There's a snippet of an argument she secretly filmed, yes.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-26 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
It's weird that you're on the internet yet have never heard of a thing called 'google'