[ SECRET POST #3803 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3803 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Dramatical Murder]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[Agents of SHIELD]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[NCIS/Bull (Michael Weatherly)]


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of rape]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #544.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

03. http://i.imgur.com/KneRpgC.png

[(Anonymous)]

Yeahhhh

Kind of just makes me appreciate John Carpenter and Dean Cundey and Halloween all the more, though, in a way

[philstar22]

Yes! I only just watched the first two Halloween movies for the first time recently. And I loved them (though I did not love the remake and couldn't even make it through the first one). They hold up really well. They are actually scary, and while there is gore (especially in the second one), they rely mostly on atmosphere and it is great.

[(Anonymous)]

The first Halloween particularly, so much of the tension comes literally just from camera positioning and cinematography. It's amazing.

I half agree.

[(Anonymous)]

Halloween is an excellent movie that holds up really well, but I still like Nightmare on Elm Street. I'm not sure they're really good for a one-to-one comparison. Halloween was straight horror and was actually inventing some horror movie conventions, while I feel like in Nightmare on Elm Street, Wes Craven was playing with some of the horror movie conventions and some of the cheesiness was absolutely intended (though probably some of the not great special effects were just due to budget constraints), I mean, Glen getting sucked into the mattress and then blood gushing to the ceiling and the police and the weirdly comical wiping of that one guy's shoes. I think some of the effects were really good (the bathtub, the wall, the lighting for the rhyme) and some were not (dummy through the door, sparkly disappearance), and the plot still freaks me out.

Re: I half agree.

[(Anonymous)]

Baby!Johnny Depp turned into a human smoothie.

[(Anonymous)]

It's cool if it's not for you, but NOES is a completely different type of horror though so your comparison is not a good one.