Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-06-02 06:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #3803 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3803 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

[Dramatical Murder]
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

[Agents of SHIELD]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[NCIS/Bull (Michael Weatherly)]
__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #544.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-02 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-02 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 09:34 am (UTC)(link)I refuse to agree that she's a Mary Sue just because she's a natural at flying, and fighting, and harnessing the force. Dudes and their giant freaking mountain of magically skilled male protagonists can fuck right off with that reasoning.
However, the fact that she's basically Luke But Better, I must admit, does make me recognize the validity of calling her a Mary Sue.
But I just have zero fucks to give about it. I like her. And I liked the movie.
Re: Inspired by #6
Ginny Weasley. I may not ship her with Harry, but that doesn't mean I think she's a sue. Ginny is awesome. She's probably my favorite Weasley. And she certainly has faults (see book 6) and is not front and center enough to really be a Sue (see book 7).
Rey. I don't even get the Sue comments with her. She's not a Sue, she's just awesome. And there are explanations for her skills that make sense. Like, she can use the force more easily than Luke could at first because, unlike Luke, she's been on her own and had to learn how to survive. She may have already been using it a bit, and certainly her ability do what she had to in order to survive would translate well into being able to instinctively use the Force against Kylo.
Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-02 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)But I agree it doesn't come off that way at all in the movie. Partly because they do a good job making a believable and likable character, partly because it's canon, partly because Star Wars is just set up to have Mary Sue-type characters who are the center of everything in the universe so it feels right.
Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-02 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)Look at how many classic Westley Crusher episodes had other characters needing the plot to make them stupid/OOC in order to make it believable that this teenage boy could totally upstage them. Rey isn't like that, the areas where Finn flails a little feel natural and she stumbles too (like telling Han she totally knows how to use a blaster, then not remembering to take the safety off)
The only character I've seen accused of making another character act dumb/OOC is Han trusting Kylo.
Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-02 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-02 23:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 00:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
FWIW, Utena Tenjou. The one time I saw her called a Sue, it was by an honest to god fan of the show who pointed out that if you change the POV of the story, she absolutely IS (super-cool teenage girl with special powers enters a well-established universe, half the male cast are in love with her, saves the day by heroic sacrifice)
Re: Inspired by #6
Re: Inspired by #6
Re: Inspired by #6
Re: Inspired by #6
Re: Inspired by #6
Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-02 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)I still personally like both JJ and Seaver, though, so...*Shrugs*
Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-02 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 00:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 00:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 00:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 01:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 12:09 am (UTC)(link)I kind of laugh about Seaver. Her setup might be a little Mary Sue in that she's the daughter of a serial killer and she's so young to be on the team, but the execution wasn't that at all. Except for her first episode where it was relevant, she was basically the person everyone else did exposition dumps to. She barely got to do anything. We barely learned anything about her. To my recollection, she only has one moment in the last episode where Rossi asks for her objective opinion but otherwise, she was an audience stand-in to ask the questions that none of the other team needed to ask. She was too bland to be a Mary Sue (I did like her though).
Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 00:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 00:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 00:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 01:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-02 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Inspired by #6
Re: Inspired by #6
Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 05:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 09:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 13:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-03 15:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 12:03 am (UTC)(link)Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 12:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 12:37 am (UTC)(link)Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 01:19 am (UTC)(link)Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 12:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: Inspired by #6
Re: Inspired by #6
Re: Inspired by #6
I'm at the point where if you call an original character in media a "Mary Sue" that I'm probably not going to listen to anything you have to say. It's become such an overly broad criticism as to be meaningless, doesn't say anything about why a character is badly developed, and is often sexist in application.
Re: Inspired by #6
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 02:41 am (UTC)(link)I like Buffy.
I like female superheroes in general, so I expect my faves overlap with the Mary Sue label a good deal.
Re: Inspired by #6