Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-06-02 06:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #3803 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3803 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

[Dramatical Murder]
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

[Agents of SHIELD]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[NCIS/Bull (Michael Weatherly)]
__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #544.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Why don't reptile owners get along with animal rights groups?
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 12:46 am (UTC)(link)Nice troll, but wrong. PETA are not considered AR activists by other animal rights activists. I would know because I've been an animal rights activist for almost a decade. The term we use for them is "new-welfarist".
Animal rights activists believe that animals should not be exploited, used, enslaved, or killed by humans (except in extreme circumstances). We don't believe they're better off dead than enslaved, PETA are the only lunatics thinking that, and any AR activist worth their salt has nothing to do with them.
A good deal of reptile "owners" keep them in small terrariums their whole lives, without much stimulation or room to move around. In particular, the ones who collect them usually have them in tanks along walls like they're some sort of fine art to admire. What kind of life is that? People think because reptiles don't emote as expressively as mammals, that they're basically pretty little robots that won't care if they spend the entirety of their lives in a space the dimensions of a desk. We're not saying kill them, we're saying stop breeding them and collecting them from the wild so you can have some fancy ornament by the wall.
Re: Why don't reptile owners get along with animal rights groups?
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 01:13 am (UTC)(link)Re: Why don't reptile owners get along with animal rights groups?
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 06:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: Why don't reptile owners get along with animal rights groups?
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 01:16 am (UTC)(link)Re: Why don't reptile owners get along with animal rights groups?
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 06:49 am (UTC)(link)I think it's great to adopt animals, but it's messed up to bring beings into this world whose lives are destined to be completely controlled by another, just so we can have someone that will love us. That's really selfish.
In an ideal world where humans didn't treat animals like objects, I believe we could befriend wild animals. There are many cases of friendships between wild animals and humans. But if you have to force an animal to stick around you, that is not a relationship of equals.
Re: Why don't reptile owners get along with animal rights groups?
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 02:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: Why don't reptile owners get along with animal rights groups?
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 06:55 am (UTC)(link)There are plenty of POC animal rights activists who agree with the term and have even become vegan BECAUSE of the parallels. The head of Farm Animal Rights Movement is a jewish man who survived the Holocaust and didn't want to treat animals the way he had been treated.
Maybe it offends you because it causes you to rethink your relationship with other animals in a way that makes you uncomfortable.
Re: Why don't reptile owners get along with animal rights groups?
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 04:26 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Why don't reptile owners get along with animal rights groups?
(Anonymous) 2017-06-03 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)I feel a similar annoyance towards people who have their own biological children instead of adopting. There's a reason why if you ask a parent why they chose to have a child, they'll always start off their response with "I wanted". It's a selfish choice. They want someone who will love them unconditionally, someone who will work for them, someone who will take care of them when they get old. It's always "me me me". It's impossible to have a child for the child's sake.
I feel similarly about domestication. Domestication is about messing with the genetics of a being, making them less able to survive on their own, so that humans can use them. Dogs and cats are pretty much the only examples of animals that likely choose to live alongside humans of their own free will. But even then there is a lot about how humans keep them these days that is greatly concerning.
I'm not against keeping animals if they're adopted. Adoption helps homeless animals with nowhere else to go. But breeding them, especially when there are so many homeless animals out there, is creating these beings who are utterly dependent on us, simply because we want a friend who won't go away, or we want someone to work for us, or give us something. I can't think of a single reason why people breed animals that isn't motivated by our own self interest. Domestic animals are not like wild animals that are in danger of extinction, which is the only reasonable excuse for breeding animals in a controlled setting.
And yeah, I don't get to make that choice for everyone, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna shut up about it. Someone has to speak up for animals since, by and large, no one cares what they think.