[ SECRET POST #3808 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3808 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[http://sarahcandersen.com/post/96540470653]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #545.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[thewakokid]

Not logically, no, but I don't see that as the key point. Id still feel the shock of seeing my dad dead even if I didn't believe it.

And again, he's 11.

If you show an 11 year old a photo of his dead dad, and he spazes out, you would conclude he believed it was real, right? any adult would make that assumption. Any adult who's not trying to frame the 11 year old as a sociopath lacking human emotions. Then that adult might be inclined to call the kid a faker and say shit like "Oh, he didn't really believe it, tho" like that makes a damn bit of difference. You show a kid a photo of his dad beheaded, the kid screams and gets upset, it is not a logical leap to assume the kid believed it, even if he didn't. even if you wouldn't believe it.

[ketita]

I gotta agree. Way stupider shit gave me nightmares when I was 11. If animated ducks could do that to me, I don't know what I would think about something like that... I don't know if it really happened, but it's believable, if the kid saw it.