[ SECRET POST #3808 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3808 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[http://sarahcandersen.com/post/96540470653]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #545.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: unpopular opinions

[kallanda_lee]

Devil's advocate here, though. The way welfare works where I live is you get a sum based on your previous income, your dependents (kids, disabled or old people), and duration of unemployment. Thing is people choose what to do with it, and it's accepted people have free will. This means that if I want to spend it on cigarettes (I don't I don't smoke, but hypothetically) I can. I mean, if that means I can only eat once a day or can't put central heating on, but it's still free will.

I don't really have any bad habit that cost money, but yeah, if I want to save up and go to a con, I will. And fortunately not too many people begrudge me that.

I think both systems have merit and can be argued for or against, but a system where the government just pays a sum and does not micromanage is also possible.