[ SECRET POST #3819 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3819 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #547.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I agree that religion is a huge force that shapes peoples' beliefs, but it also is shaped by those beliefs. I agree that specific religious traditions have played a significant role in many bad things, as a force in peoples' beliefs. I agree that suffering has been caused in the name of Islam. That does not mean that those things are intrinsically tied into any possible Islam. You can change it and people are changing it.

The point I'm making about religion being socially constructed - to be clear - is not denying that religion doesn't influence peoples' worldviews. It's a massive constituent part of their worldview - but it is also partly constructed by that worldview. So when you're talking about the role that religion plays in forming a worldview, it plays the same kind of role that any other social institution does. What it doesn't have - and this is really the central important point that I want to make - is any kind of transhistorical eternal core. There's no absolute, atemporal essence of Islamness that exists outside of particular social situations.

I agree with the ideal that you need to have a culture that's good for all beings. My whole point of view is that there's no intrinsic conflict between those beliefs, and any Abrahamic religion. They are not mutually exclusive. I recognize the harm that those religions have done when they don't promote that kind of culture. There's just no reason, at all, whatsoever, that they need to be regressive. And I don't see the point of rejecting those forms of them which aren't regressive. That's really my whole argument here.