[ SECRET POST #3829 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3829 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #548.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I really wish they'd stop rehashing pre-TOS, tbh.

100% agree.

It feels like people get the idea in their heads that they need to bring back the ~feeling~ of Star Trek as a cultural phenomenon in the late 1960s, when in fact that is a minuscule fraction of actually existing Star Trek.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, like, I'm excited for Discovery because of the cast, but my preferred Trek is easily the 90s shows, never been much into TOS and dislike ENT.

[(Anonymous)]

The problem is they don't really know why TOS chimed with the 1960s (or TNG in the 1980s) the showrunners don't know how to make Star Trek fit with current American ideals and still keep it Star Trek.

[ketita]

^SO MUCH AGREEMENT. I think they don't actually understand Star Trek, really, so all they're left with is the scenery. They're hoping if they make it look like Star Trek and quack like Star Trek it'll be a Star Trek.