Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-06-29 06:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #3830 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3830 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Drake Bell and Josh Peck from Drake & Josh]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Death in Paradise, Ardal O'Hanlon]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Dreamwidth Roleplay]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Final Fantasy X & X-2]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Outlander]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Animal Crossing/Legend of Zelda]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Daredevil TV]
__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #548.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-29 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-29 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)But framing it as a revealed truth, the way the piece does, is just fucking weak.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-29 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)Actually, the second one would bug me more because the first one is just obviously stupid, but the second one seems like something some people would latch onto. I'm getting really tired of the outcast/misfit = LGBT thing some people have been pushing lately.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-29 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)Like
I don't think any of the arguments advanced are necessarily unreasonable, in and of themselves, when you're talking in terms of a relationship with the text and an interpretive strategy that goes beyond the text. Like, really, all you're doing in that case is choosing to emphasize specific textual ambiguities and use them for your own purposes. Which is fine. Going beyond the text is a fine way of reading. I have no beef with doing that, and I think the actual Snape fans in the piece mostly frame it that way (feels like ~80% percent).
It's really the Vice article itself that's framing it as HIDDEN SECRETS OF HARRY POTTER REVEALED that bothers me. Especially because it 100% is not a HIDDEN SECRET OF HARRY POTTER in any kind of authorial intent sense, I tell you that much straight off the motherfucking press.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-29 23:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 00:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-29 23:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 00:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 01:18 (UTC) - Expandno subject
And their contextual clues are that Snape is protective of Harry (bc only women are protective apparently), his patronus is feminine, and also that the Snape-boggart gets put into women's clothing???
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-29 23:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 04:24 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-29 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)it's tricky, cause if someone just wants to take those elements and elaborate on them, I think that's great and dandy, but at the same time, there just is a massive distance between that and textual clues allowing us to conclude anything
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 12:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 03:15 am (UTC)(link)Also, it's the Wizarding World. How would she not have just fucking transitioned via magic, already?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 11:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-29 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-29 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
I remember muggleborn headcanons being a thing last time I was on Tumblr. All these ideas about in-jokes they would have that the purebloods wouldn't understand that got old for me pretty quickly.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-29 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)https://goo.gl/images/xcXGVH
https://goo.gl/images/kJkRpx
https://goo.gl/images/obzQ83
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 01:57 (UTC) - Expandno subject
They're... pretty dumb.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-29 23:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 12:19 am (UTC)(link)Like I especially hate the "Muggleborn has a patronus that's godzilla/The Rock/Elsa From Frozen/Bandycoot Cumberbund and all the purebloods are all O_O SO KEWL OMg!" Like in canon it's pretty obvious it's a normal animal, and if it could be something weird then why wouldn't purebloods have dragons and gryphons and thunderbirds and shit? They're going to go "That's a weird ugly dragon, what kind of dragon is that?" Not "OMG GOJIRRA!!!!111!!1evenentyone!"
no subject
But the pop culture focused ones get really obnoxious really fast.
no subject
When Snape tells the class that she doesn't "expect you will really understand the beauty of the softly simmering cauldron with its shimmering fumes, the delicate power of liquids that creep through human veins," she invokes classically feminine witchcraft symbolism.
Or he's a guy who's really into cunnilingus.
no subject
no subject