[ SECRET POST #3834 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3834 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #549.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

No.

[(Anonymous)]

Interpret the text how you like, but someone else isn't stupid, much less monumentally so, for deciding that a character is telling the truth when he says something definitive about his sexuality. Can people conclude other things? Sure. But concluding that a character is straight because he says that he is in canon (and isn't shown to be obviously lying) is perfectly valid.

Re: No.

[(Anonymous)]

It's nice that you live in a world where no one has to be in the closet, in fact I wish I lived there. Unfortunatly, in the one I live in, I work with a lot of Catholics (and actually like most of my job) so I have to stay closeted.

Re: No.

[(Anonymous)]

da

oh come off it lmao it's a fictional character if he was deliberately in the closet there would be evidence in the writing.

Re: No.

[(Anonymous)]

Please read again. I said another interpretation is possible. In other words, he could be lying, but thinking he is telling the truth is not stupid.

Re: No.

[(Anonymous)]

Yes! This is pretty much my response exactly.