(no subject)

[case]

Since it's come to my attention that certain communities have been purposely posting troll secrets for the lulz, I'm going to start getting harsher on what counts as a non-troll secret, especially regarding the fandom involved.

ETA2: No, this isn't only SPN fandom. This goes for everyone else, too.

Just a heads up.

And apologies in advance if any real secret posters get caught up in this.

Comments

Re: functionally illiterate

[witchling.livejournal.com]

Oh, honey. Attacking my spelling isn't going to make you - or the stupid choices that SPN fandom makes - look any smarter. But thanks for the heads up. Really.

Re: functionally illiterate

[(Anonymous)]

Just trying to make YOU look smarter, bb -- I don't need the help. You're welcome for the heads-up, though.

(Take the dictionary suggestion to heart, all jokes aside. Illiteracy is not attractive.

Re: functionally illiterate

[(Anonymous)]

CLOSE YOUR PARENTHESIS DUMBASS.

Re: functionally illiterate

[(Anonymous)]

OH SNAP. You got me there, bb.


Here ya go:


)


Satisfied?

Re: functionally illiterate

[euphorazine.livejournal.com]

WE ARE ALL FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE HERE. AT LEAST WE'RE TRYING TO OVERCOME IT BY READING THE DICTIONARY.

Re: functionally illiterate

[dividedloyalty.livejournal.com]

Don't knock the use of dictionary! It makes anyone look smarter.
Ask Jensen. trufax.

Re: functionally illiterate

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, yes. Your next step should be to enroll yourself into some courses at the nearest Life College. Will definitely help out, witchbb.

Re: functionally illiterate

[(Anonymous)]

the stupid choices that SPN fandom makes

Generalizations aren't a good color on anyone. You shouldn't assume that one segment of a group does or does not do has anything to do with or is approved by the entirety of the group.

Re: functionally illiterate

[(Anonymous)]

*nods head*


AGREED!