case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-21 06:25 pm

[ SECRET POST #3852 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3852 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03. http://i.imgur.com/4sW0XLi.jpg
[Mary Elizabeth Winstead in Fargo, season 3 - linked/OP warned for nudity]


__________________________________________________











04. [SPOILERS for Fargo]



__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of abortion]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for physical and psychological abuse]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for incest]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for dub con/non con]

[Jafar/Jasmine, Aladdin]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #551.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-22 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
DA

Considering the vast quantity of romance novels from the seventies with titles like The Sheikh's Captive Bride and whatnot, I'd be careful pointing fingers.

At least these days dubcon is acknowledged as a kink, instead of 'that's just how romance stories go'.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-22 06:17 am (UTC)(link)
I think you've got the wrong decade. The vast quantity of romance titles in the '70s are much more florid and fanciful: A Kiss from Satan, Leopard in the Snow, Tender Torment, The Flame and the Flower, etc. There was a Johanna Lindsey book Captive Bride which did feature a sheikh, but the boring, what-it-says-on-the-tin titles (e.g. Bought for the Tycoon’s Advantage) are a more recent development.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-22 07:10 am (UTC)(link)
(Sorry, my bad.)

(Anonymous) 2017-07-22 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
(It's fine! I apparently have a lot of feelings about the history of publishing romance novels.)