case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-21 06:25 pm

[ SECRET POST #3852 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3852 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03. http://i.imgur.com/4sW0XLi.jpg
[Mary Elizabeth Winstead in Fargo, season 3 - linked/OP warned for nudity]


__________________________________________________











04. [SPOILERS for Fargo]



__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of abortion]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for physical and psychological abuse]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for incest]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for dub con/non con]

[Jafar/Jasmine, Aladdin]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #551.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-22 06:17 am (UTC)(link)
I think you've got the wrong decade. The vast quantity of romance titles in the '70s are much more florid and fanciful: A Kiss from Satan, Leopard in the Snow, Tender Torment, The Flame and the Flower, etc. There was a Johanna Lindsey book Captive Bride which did feature a sheikh, but the boring, what-it-says-on-the-tin titles (e.g. Bought for the Tycoon’s Advantage) are a more recent development.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-22 07:10 am (UTC)(link)
(Sorry, my bad.)

(Anonymous) 2017-07-22 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
(It's fine! I apparently have a lot of feelings about the history of publishing romance novels.)