fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3853 ]

[ SECRET POST #3853 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3853 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 43 secrets from Secret Submission Post #551.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

DA

There's being respectful of differences and there is "everything you say or do is racist / ableist / transphobic / homo-bi-ace-phobic / misogynist / sexist / ageist / something-phobic" being thrown out to derail any further discussion because the person accused has to defend themselves against that and the discussion never gets back to the root of the matter. The SJW then sits back and revels in how "progressive" they are when they didn't solve anything.

The absolute worst SJWs only act behind a computer screen and never do anything substantial for their cause offline. Hey, I'm just generalizing like they generalize. They expect everybody else to do their dirty work instead. Even disabled activists dependent on total care still find a way to get out and do shit. When was the last time anyone saw these militant SJWs do that? The absolute most they do is disrupt rallies and turn into fodder for cringe compilation videos later.

I think OP is tired of seeing everything I show does never be good enough to satisfy the 'craycray' SJWs.

I'm not going to get into this stupid argument about how everyone who wants diversity is a hypocrite who doesn't get out and demonstrate, I will just say that OP is completely unspecific about how they're using the term SJW.

I think it's fairly obvious they're talking about the unreasonable ones who won't stop complaining no matter how well written or diverse something is. They have no concept that nothing is perfect and that creators owe them zilch.

The question is what counts as unreasonable. I think they think they're responding to people being unreasonable, but I think that people who talk about SJWs generally include about 90% of people who think more diversity is good as "unreasonable".

What I find unreasonable and what I think OP is getting at is they went crying for a woman, weren't specific about what kind of woman and getting all angry that she's white because how dare someone default to white.

To make it smaller, it's like being a minority in a foreign country like Mexico where the people default to Mexican more or less and that minority person visiting there is mad that a show cast a Mexican actor or actress for something.

Imagine Egypt with a black actor or actress. Etc. Etc. Etc.

That is what I'm reading in the secret.

What I find unreasonable and what I think OP is getting at is they went crying for a woman, weren't specific about what kind of woman and getting all angry that she's white because how dare someone default to white.

I don't think most people are getting angry about it, and I think it's misleading and inaccurate to act like that's a reasonable representation of what people are saying.

*shrugs* - I've seen EXACTLY that being said.

They actually said what counts as unreasonable in their very comment so if you'd take your head out of your ass to ask actually read what was being written instead of imagining things you think were maybe written, you'd see that.

Damn it, I'm not wide awake enough for this crap.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[ SECRET POST #3853 ]

DA

Re: DA

Re: DA

Re: DA

Re: DA

Re: DA

Re: DA

Re: DA

SA: Typo correction: everything a^ show does