Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-07-29 03:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #3860 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3860 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #553.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)Also, gen fics CAN HAVE PAIRINGS. THEY'RE JUST NOT SUPPOSED TO BE THE FOCUS.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)Where was this fest anyway?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)Common usage now tends to be "fics where the focus is on something that's not a romantic or sexual relationship."
There's also a third definition of gen that I've heard, which defines gen as being "like an episode of the show." Which is an interesting guideline for the inclusion or exclusion of background romance, but only covers a small segment of gen. There are a lot of genres, such as hurt/comfort, slice of life, and future fics, that don't actually look like an episode of the show.
What it sounds like to me is that the mod was using definition 1 and the OP was using definition 2, and both of them were assuming that they agreed on a definition.
The only gen fic exchange I'm familiar with (Supernatural Summer Gen) has the definition of "gen" that they are using in the info page, which prevents this kind of confusion.
no subject