[ SECRET POST #3861 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3861 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06. [broken]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #553.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: I rememeber what I wanted to show here!

[(Anonymous)]

I just saw this today and was massively disappointed by the complete and total lack of a plot. And still I think that review is stupid. Subjective bits aside, the author calls it the battle of Dunkirk! No surprise she wasn't disappointed that we never saw the HQ in the cliffs of Dover or the military and civilian perspectives in the week leading up to the evacuation or even the civilian craft landing on the beach.

I really did hate this film but I also loved it for unapologetically being exactly what it wanted to be. It wasn't the film I was looking for, but it never needed to be. It's a great spin on an often tired genre and it was crafted to immerse the audience in the events. It massively succeeded and the entire cast, including that 1D kid who I didn't even recognise until the end, did a brilliant job.

Re: I rememeber what I wanted to show here!

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, and I meant to say I don't think you're being knee-jerky. I'm a forty year old woman and I have much the same response to her article.