[ SECRET POST #3888 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3888 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Eh, I'm not OP, but 15 is definitely a child. Not a prepubescent child, but absolutely a child. I consider all teens to be kids. And it's not cool for adults to fuck them, unless they are very very close in age.

[(Anonymous)]

Yup, this.^

[(Anonymous)]

How about no.

[(Anonymous)]

Agree with your last sentence completely, but disagree with your first.

I don't equate a teen with a child. There's a world of difference between 13 and 19, but that whole in-between stage is the transition from child to adult, and it seems weird to devolve them to children. A "kid", on the other hand, seems to me a more colloquial term, not necessarily denoting children, in the same way that "you guys" is not necessarily referring to boys/men.

Oh, and yes, this is more a semantic argument around teen=child vs a question of sexual activity. As mentioned, I agree with your first sentence. I just don't like to conflate teenagers with children.

[(Anonymous)]

Wanna preach in this troll secret of all places?

Obscuring the definition of child to include teens is an excuse to push around your little fangirl blog ethics. Your little politically correct parameters to police teen sexuality is horseshit.