Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-08-26 03:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #3888 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3888 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: You're not special OP
(Anonymous) 2017-08-26 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)Not sure what AYRT would say, but IMO, people who get off on noncon should feel a little weird that they get off on the idea of rape. They don't have to be worried that they'll insult someone in real life.
If the idea of rape excites you, that's disturbing in and of itself.
Nayrt
(Anonymous) 2017-08-26 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)I've gotten off to hostage/captor smut frequently. But I also triple check the doors at night and shake on terror at the idea of someone breaking in.
Re: You're not special OP
(Anonymous) 2017-08-26 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)Re: You're not special OP
(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 12:23 am (UTC)(link)In the case where someone writes a smut fic in which an underage person has sex with an adult, the main problem, IMO, is that their perspective is not the audience's perspective. Maybe it's hot to the writer because they're imagining having their first sexual encounter with an idealized yet inappropriate older figure. This doesn't seem weird or unhealthy to me, any more than imagining how our high school experience could have been if life were more like fiction. Or maybe they're a CSA who's imagining themselves back in the shoes of the victim, but this time recontextualizing the situation in a way that helps them somehow. I have no opinion on that.
But when someone posts that fantasy publicly, in the form of a story that's about other, publicly shared characters, what that fantasy is for them doesn't go with it. The fantasy becomes something far more objective. And objectively, they've now posted a story that's about an adult having sex with a kid.
WORD to this, anon. I'd never quite put it in these terms in my mind, but this is it exactly.
Re: You're not special OP
(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 03:38 am (UTC)(link)DA
(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 05:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 06:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: You're not special OP
(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 01:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: You're not special OP
(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 01:21 am (UTC)(link)The only thing I can fathom is that deep down, you won't consider what that actual core stance is, because you're afraid you'd find it too legitimate for comfort.
Re: You're not special OP
(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 03:43 am (UTC)(link)Re: You're not special OP
(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 04:42 am (UTC)(link)Re: You're not special OP
(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 12:18 pm (UTC)(link)Re: You're not special OP
(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 03:35 am (UTC)(link)Re: You're not special OP
(Anonymous) 2017-08-27 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)