case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-09-15 06:39 pm

[ SECRET POST #3908 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3908 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Kingsman (movies)]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Twin Peaks, David Duchovny as Denise Bryson (née Dennis Bryson)]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Meghan Markle, Suits]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Wonder Woman]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Labyrinth]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #559.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-09-15 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I haven't seen the movie, so I don't have any idea whether or not its text or subtext or anything. But I'm really not sure that I follow your argument. If there was originally a scene that made it look like text, and they intentionally removed that scene, but left in a lot of scenes that feel more subtext-y, that doesn't really sound very accidental to me. That actually sounds pretty intentional.

Again, I'm just going off what you wrote here and it's entirely possible I've misunderstood something.

(Anonymous) 2017-09-15 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Or, it could be that they didn't really realize just how subtexty/texty it was until they got into the editing bay. Reshoots are expensive, so maybe they took the path of least resistance and cut the most textual bit and did their best with what they had to tell the story they wanted to tell.

(Anonymous) 2017-09-15 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe, I guess. But it seems like that would be really hard to distinguish from intentional queerbaiting. I mean, it would basically be some kind of accidental queerbaiting at that point. And I'm not sure how mad I could get at fans for responding to something that's functionally indistinguishable from queerbaiting.