[ SECRET POST #3914 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3914 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Smallville]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Riley, Julie's Greenroom]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Anne with an E]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Bojack Horseman]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Jeeves and Wooster, P.G. Wodehouse]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #560.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Everyone's nonbinary?

[(Anonymous)]

"Gender expression" is an obnoxious phrase because it implies that anyone who does not present how society expects them to present based on gender stereotypes is somehow queer. That's complete bullshit. People can act true to themselves and in a way that society doesn't expect, and not make up new pronouns for themselves.

Re: Everyone's nonbinary?

[cbrachyrhynchos]

No it doesn't. I use "gender expression" because while we have substantial documentation about people who cross-dressed or did androgyny for substantial parts of their lives at substantial risk and cost, history hasn't been kind to their own words and beliefs with a handful of exceptions.

The notion that recognizing nonbinary gender marks any form of gender nonconformity as queer is a ridiculous slippery slope. No, the existence of Kate Bornstein and Leslie Feinberg do not make girls who game and boys who knit queer. Gender roles have some flexibility, but limited. GNC subcultures are flexible in different ways. Bornstein and Feinberg started talking about nonbinary gender having considerable experience with those limits.

The last time I saw a survey on the pronoun issue--unfortunately a convenience sample--singular "they" was the winner, followed by the classic neopronouns from the 1970s. I've seen little widespread support for "nounself." I tend to agree with Le Guin that not having a gender-neutral human pronoun limits what you can say about gender (a flaw of Le Guin, Leckie, and Banks.) Literary constraints aside, I see little reason to not respect a person's preferred mode of address if they're not being a dick about it. Bickering about preferred nonbinary pronouns sounds suspiciously like the bickering regarding changing binary pronouns. And now that both the GLAAD and AP style guide agree that "they" is acceptable in print for nonbinary people who prefer "they," it's a bit like being a dick over "email."