case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-09-29 07:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #3922 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3922 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Splatoon 2]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Punisher]


__________________________________________________






























05. [WARNING for non-con]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for The Great British Bake Off series 8]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of eating disorders]

[Mila Kunis, Natalie Portman / The Black Swan]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #561.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

DA

(Anonymous) 2017-09-30 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
I've seen articles about women diagnosed with anorexia who managed to give birth to apparently healthy babies - albeit babies of low birth weight.

However, to my understanding, up until the DSM-5 came out in 2013, cessation of menstruation was one of the criteria necessary to be met in order for a female to be diagnosed with anorexia in the first place. Link:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK49317/

The way the DSM-4 phrases it makes it sound as though, medically speaking, a diagnoses of anorexia nervosa was dependent on the sufferer not menstruating. Which would mean all individuals with an official diagnosis of anorexia nervosa would be unable to become pregnant. However, I'm not sure if that particular criteria for diagnosis was actually upheld in practice, even before it was phased out of the DSM.