case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-10-02 05:22 pm

[ SECRET POST #3925 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3925 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #562.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Minor NSFW Vent

(Anonymous) 2017-10-03 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
If it focused on, I don't know, actually interviewing and compiling data on what guys liked about it and also their feelings on women and was any kind of a psychological data discussion I would feel differently. But it jumped right to the idea masturbating with an object is raping that object and they want something that is always available and can't say no, a literal object!

"Sex dolls not only don’t challenge male entitlement to women’s bodies, they entrench it. Even the term “owner” for the buyer of the doll implies this. It sends a message that men can “own” a sex object which is designed for them to do whatever they like with. The owners are entitled to act out whatever fantasy they have on their doll. "