Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-10-02 05:22 pm
[ SECRET POST #3925 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3925 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #562.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Minor NSFW Vent
Re: Minor NSFW Vent
(Anonymous) 2017-10-03 01:14 am (UTC)(link)"Sex dolls not only don’t challenge male entitlement to women’s bodies, they entrench it. Even the term “owner” for the buyer of the doll implies this. It sends a message that men can “own” a sex object which is designed for them to do whatever they like with. The owners are entitled to act out whatever fantasy they have on their doll. "
Re: Minor NSFW Vent
(Anonymous) 2017-10-03 01:52 am (UTC)(link)It does sound like the article went straight for the worst and most accusatory conclusion, though, which definitely isnt doing their cause any favors. Like, as much as I personally an deeply sick of being treated as something lesser for men to try to get their way with and have their way with, and having experiened that makes me inclined to not give men the benefit of the doubt when it comes to their sexual ideology, I can still see how, for most guys, an article jumping to the worst conclusions like that would be infuriating.