[ SECRET POST #3939 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3939 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 34 secrets from Secret Submission Post #564.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Things you straight up don’t get

[morieris]

I can see trying to normalize it...but presumably she's not talking to five people at once in an email, just one at a time, and you're probably not going to be using pronouns that aren't 'you'.

Re: Things you straight up don’t get

[(Anonymous)]

but... why would putting pronouns in a professional work e-mail signature need to be "normalized"?

and what's the point of declaring the gender everyone would've assumed you were anyway?

Re: Things you straight up don’t get

[morieris]

Yeah, this is someone being wellmeaning but misguided.

Re: Things you straight up don’t get

[(Anonymous)]

If it's an email signature, doesn't that most likely mean that it's something that gets appended to every e-mail regardless of the context?

I mean, either way, I just don't agree that there's anything "unprofessional" about it. So the basic premise of anon's argument is wrong.