case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-10-28 03:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #3951 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3951 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
(The Shape Of Water)


__________________________________________________



09.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 60 secrets from Secret Submission Post #566.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
kaijinscendre: (dbz)

Re: Based on 3!

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2017-10-28 08:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Bladerunner. I've watched it three times now. Two different versions. I just don't get what people like about it other than visuals. But the awesome visuals do not outweigh the slow as fuck, sometimes nonsensical plot with meh acting to me.
greghousesgf: (Hugh Smile)

Re: Based on 3!

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2017-10-28 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
this, and I don't even like some of the visuals. Dark City was a MUCH better movie.
ginainthekingsroad: a scan of a Victorian fashion plate; a dark haired woman with glasses (me?) (Default)

Re: Based on 3!

[personal profile] ginainthekingsroad 2017-10-28 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes! I saw it for the first time last week. I wasn't sure what else I should have been getting out of it, but whatever it was, it wasn't there. There was no spark for me. Except a little in Daryl Hannah's scenes.
dahli: winnar @ lj (Default)

Re: Based on 3!

[personal profile] dahli 2017-10-29 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Saaame.

Re: Based on 3!

(Anonymous) 2017-10-29 08:30 am (UTC)(link)
Count me in on this as well. Visually, yes, it was exceptional, especially for its time. But that's about it.