case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-10-29 12:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #3952 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3952 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.








Notes:

Really early, sorry!

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 51 secrets from Secret Submission Post #566.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-10-30 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
I see your point, but:

1. OP didn't claim that shitty art is proof that the person who made it is also shitty, they just said they felt that in this one specific case, they feel like his shittiness isn't just a put on for laughs.

2. And it turns out OP was right in this case. It's one thing to play a racist character, it's quite another thing to do the whole "Ching-chong-ching-chong!" thing at an Asian person, then say you don't remember it and maybe that person was "misremembering", and THEN say that oh, if it happened it must've been because you were playing a racist character and the person you were mocking just didn't get your "comedy".

(Anonymous) 2017-10-30 04:35 am (UTC)(link)
They weren't right in this case. It happened to be the case that the person whose comedy they disliked was also a dick.