[ SECRET POST #3953 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3953 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #566.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)

[(Anonymous)]

I'm pretty sure he's talking about gay men, and I think he's specifically trying to make sure the discussions of consent and appropriate sexual advances that people are having because of Weinstein et al don't get uncritically applied to accounts of interaction between gay men.

I can see what he means in theory (though I dunno about how super advanced gay men's sexuality is) but I think he's being a little hasty. Right now the victim everyone's talking about is literally a child.

Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)

[(Anonymous)]

But, like, what are the actual norms that he wants to defend

Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)

[(Anonymous)]

I don't see why it matters? He says "Gay men touch each other and sexually interact with each other in ways that would terrify straight men and women" and he seems to have an entire internet presences dedicated fighting "the imperialism of straight culture". I'm not interested, but if I were I could connect the dots.