Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-11-11 03:18 pm
[ SECRET POST #3965 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3965 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 54 secrets from Secret Submission Post #568.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

What's the story of that?
Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-11 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)https://fanlore.org/wiki/Diana_Gabaldon
https://kate-nepveu.dreamwidth.org/836748.html
Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-11 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)Somewhere in the middle of this one of her 'fans' posted Stacie's personal information on one of Gabaldon's anti - fanfic blogs. It's kind of what puts it above the typical 'author hates fanfic' wanks.
Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-11 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-11 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-11 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)No worries. It's referenced enough in the followup post that I think I get the picture. I don't personally see "went after a cancer patient" when an author who's anti fanfic chose instead to donate a set of books to the charity drive instead of...writing a fanfic? Autographing a fanfic? That part isn't clear to me but it still didn't read to me the way the secret maker portrayed it.
Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-11 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)The comments in the posts goes into a bit of detail about the personal info being posted.
Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-11 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)I think what we have is an author approaching this as if it's all about trying to be authors and asking "But how does this make you an AUTHOR like me, dear?" and on the other side we have fanfic writers and readers who are like "We just want stories about these two dudes kissing."
Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-11 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-11 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)http://www.syfy.com/syfywire/doctor-who-actor-who-inspired-jamie-fraser-star-outlander
Re: What's the story of that? ayrt
(Anonymous) 2017-11-11 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)Wow, thank you.
That is FUCKED UP omg.
Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-12 10:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-12 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)A) ever wrote fanfiction (even if it stayed hidden in a notebook and no one else ever got to see it),
B) ever read fanfiction deliberately or wanted to, or
C) very clearly cribbed some characters and ideas from other media in such a blatant way,
should really just shut the hell up about fanfiction. At some point, they clearly felt the same draw towards fanworks that everyone else feels, but they buried this under a drive to be published authors and a bunch of flailing about copyright. Now there's a disconnect between why most people write and consume fanworks and why some authors think people do it, and the authors are getting on a soapbox to lecture people while totally missing the point.
Gabaldon doesn't have to be *comfortable* with people writing Outlander fanfic just because she based a character on a Doctor Who companion, but it should make her able to understand why people care about someone else's characters.
Re: What's the story of that?
(Anonymous) 2017-11-11 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)