case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-11-23 06:22 pm

[ SECRET POST #3977 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3977 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[North & South]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #569.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-11-25 10:13 am (UTC)(link)
+1000

I'm fine with both medievalesque fantasies that have egalitarian gender roles and medievalesque fantasies that have historically accurate gender roles. But what I can't stand are stories/authors that pretend their OTT misogyny is required because of "realism" when it's really not historically accurate at all.