case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-11-26 04:01 pm

[ SECRET POST #3980 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3980 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Big Family Cooking Showdown]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Michael Fassbender/Alicia Vikander]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Team Fourstar/Dragon Ball Z Abridged]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Nurarihyon no Mago]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Candice Swanepoel (Victoria's Secret)]


__________________________________________________



07.
(Stranger Things, season 2)


__________________________________________________



08.
[Christian Bale]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #570.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Should creative endeavours ever be bought or sold?

(Anonymous) 2017-11-26 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)
In our current economic climate, art should be treated like any other trade skill with loads of protections to prevent plagiarism only to protect livelihood, but don't take this as endorsement to uphold the current laws in place.

If posted publicly, non-profit oriented redistribution with credit should be fair game regardless of how the creator feels.

The idea of intellectual property is counterproductive and discourages creativity. As for the rules applying to art, something along a copyleft* philosophy would be my ideal.

*https://www.gnu.org/licenses/copyleft.en.html