case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-11-26 04:01 pm

[ SECRET POST #3980 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3980 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Big Family Cooking Showdown]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Michael Fassbender/Alicia Vikander]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Team Fourstar/Dragon Ball Z Abridged]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Nurarihyon no Mago]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Candice Swanepoel (Victoria's Secret)]


__________________________________________________



07.
(Stranger Things, season 2)


__________________________________________________



08.
[Christian Bale]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #570.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
raspberryrain: (woe)

Re: Should creative endeavours ever be bought or sold?

[personal profile] raspberryrain 2017-11-27 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
I think the defence of file-sharing usually comes from a different place than what you're describing. If it has crossed over into claiming that anything creative should be free, that's a big problem. I don't get to just take a physical piece of artwork.

File-sharers defend file-sharing as it is copying things, not stealing them. It can be based in a rejection of "intellectual property," or a sort of economic argument that once it's easy to copy something the price of a copy naturally goes way down; often both. Is it self-serving? Yes. But so is the idea of intellectual property.