Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-01-01 03:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #4016 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4016 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Intelligence, The Romeo Section]
__________________________________________________
03.

[American Vandal, Sara Pearson/Mr. Kraz]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Winona Ryder]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Doctor Who]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Bring It On]
__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #575.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-02 12:11 am (UTC)(link)Or are you a gamergate type?
I think you should be the one doing the research, OP and stop drinking the proverbial coolaid.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-02 12:27 am (UTC)(link)So does she deserve it? Absolutely not, because that type of behaviour is vile no matter who it's directed at.
But I also don't think anyone with her type of personality and presence on the internet should be particularly surprised at the vitriol spewn her way. Is it great that these things happened to her? No. Was it to be expected? Sadly, yes. Does it excuse the bullshit she pulled and give her some sort of "get out of everything without honest criticism" card? No it doesn't.
no subject
I don't get the AYRT's logic "Here are her flaws" "Let me point out that she has been victimised"
Like... yeah, that's terrible, I think we all agree it's terrible, but it's sort of unrelated to her flaws... unless the relationship that's being suggested is that her flaws should be ignored because of her victim status? In which case I want to know how long Anita has been anoning here on F!S.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-02 12:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-02 12:41 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Did you know gay frogs cant melt steel beams?
no subject
Seriously "I find her disingenuous and fake" "Do think think she deserves death threats?" Like... there's no logical link between those two things. There's no reason to bring it up. We're talking about her flaws, not her victim status.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-02 02:59 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-02 03:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Now did she capitalise on them? She sure did. As is her right, I suppose.
Do those threats negate any of the legitimate criticisms of her? I promise you they do not. She's awful, just awful. But she did absolutely catch death and rape threats, that's just a fact.
You might be able to argue that they were not actionable threats. The internet is full of "tough guys", but I don't think that negates the unacceptability of the death threats.