case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-01-05 10:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #4020 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4020 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________


















02. [SPOILERS for The Last Jedi]

[Star Wars, TFA and TLJ]


__________________________________________________



03. [SPOILERS for Orwell]



__________________________________________________





04. [WARNING for discussion of rapefic]



__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of sexual violence]

[Goblin Slayer]


__________________________________________________



06.[WARNING for discussion of Weinstein/sexual assault]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of rape]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #575.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
nightscale: Starbolt (Star Trek: Uhura)

Re: Redemption Arcs

[personal profile] nightscale 2018-01-06 04:40 am (UTC)(link)
It depends on the villain for me.

Some I could see actually changing their ways and trying to do good, others are so intrisicly vile or awful that no redemption would work or make sense without warping the character horribly. Either way they'd need to face some kind of repercussions for their actions and the others characters shouldn't be like 'oh they're good now, let's forget everything bad they did!' because that always feels cheap to me.

For a canon counterpoint I always think of Zuko from AtLA, because I loved how his was done.