Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-01-07 03:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #4022 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4022 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 45 secrets from Secret Submission Post #576.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Things you straight up do not get.
(Anonymous) 2018-01-07 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)Yes, it's been explained to me. Yes, I get that the only way to write 1/3 in numerals has to be 3.3(repeating), and so it has to by definition equal 1 when tripled. But I can't wrap my brain around why it doesn't ALSO indicate something that is not quite 1.
Re: Things you straight up do not get.
(Anonymous) 2018-01-07 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)But there's no such thing as the closest possible number to 1
I mean, conceptually, what exactly would that mean
Re: Things you straight up do not get.
(Anonymous) 2018-01-07 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Things you straight up do not get.
(Anonymous) 2018-01-07 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)So the problem is that such a number would have to be infinitely small. For any finite number, there's always another finite number that's closer to 1. The only finite number for which there is not another number closer to 1 is 1 itself. So the idea of "the closest number possible to 1 without being 1" has to be smaller than any finite number.
Re: Things you straight up do not get.
Re: Things you straight up do not get.
Re: Things you straight up do not get.
(Anonymous) 2018-01-07 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)Lol just to demonstrate how much I suck at math, I accidentally wrote 3.3 and 9.9 instead of... 0.3 and 0.9. That's probably indicative of a bigger problem hah.
Re: Things you straight up do not get.
(Anonymous) 2018-01-08 09:57 am (UTC)(link)Re: Things you straight up do not get.
My answer to the OPs question would be, almost any kind of complicated math stuff. I'm good at basic geometry, but anything more than that and I'm lost. I took algebra 1+2 in high school and I'm really not sure how I passed at all because once we hit square roots and graphs and shit I had no idea what was going on at all. But in my defense I'm pretty sure I have dyscalculia.
Re: Things you straight up do not get.
(Anonymous) 2018-01-08 03:19 am (UTC)(link)I so feel you on this. I actually manage to pull an...86% I think? But it was just a constant, never ending war with my homework, and I studied like twice as much for that one class as I studied for all my other classes combined, and ultimately I never felt like I genuinely understood any of it. I always felt like I was basically guessing.