case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-01-09 07:05 pm

[ SECRET POST #4024 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4024 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Star Trek; Khan from "Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan"]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Criminal Minds]


__________________________________________________



04.
[New Danganronpa V3]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Houseki no Kuni]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Discovering Bigfoot]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Ashley Olsen]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Twin Peaks]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #576.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

Twin Peeks

[personal profile] philstar22 2018-01-10 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
Is it any good? I so hate it when they do things like what the last secret is talking about. But on the other hand, she's really, really hot? And I'm kind of okay with being a hypocrite and watching it even though I have a problem. So I'm wondering if the show is any good. And do you need to have watched the original to understand what is going on?

Re: Twin Peeks

(Anonymous) 2018-01-10 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
I haven't seen the new season. I have seen the original two, and I recommend watching it, just on its own terms. It's definitely uneven, but its high moments are so unbelievably good. It's atmospheric, dramatic, really well-acted, really smart, and really, really weird. I think it definitely holds up. The caveat, though, is that like it kind of goes off the rails about halfway through the second season - once you find out the resolution of the initial mystery, the show is left spinning its wheels and coming up with new stuff, some of which works, and some of which definitely doesn't.

Anyway: original Twin Peaks - strong recommend especially if you're willing to skip a bunch of the second half of the second season.

Re: Twin Peeks

(Anonymous) 2018-01-10 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
+1 to this. Stop watching the show once Laura Palmer's killer is revealed, and you'll have almost a perfect show on your hands.

The only downside is you miss out on Denise, which is a shame because she's great.

Re: Twin Peeks

(Anonymous) 2018-01-10 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
Eh. The problem is, the first season is what made it iconic. Second season was done mostly because the first season was successful, not because it was a good sequel. Most fans acknowledge that it isn't that great. The new season is barely comprehensible, even if you've watched the first and second season.

Re: Twin Peeks

(Anonymous) 2018-01-10 10:57 am (UTC)(link)
If twin peeks gone to different realm, the euphoria of it sound seductive and just twin peeks contrast to word "b**bs or b**b*es".