case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-07-07 05:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #549 ]


⌈ Secret Post #549 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.
[is this fandom?]


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.


__________________________________________________



166.


__________________________________________________



167.


__________________________________________________



168.


__________________________________________________



169.



Notes:

Going to be doing some advertising until the 15th!

[livejournal.com profile] livelongnmarry [LJ comm] - fandom auction type place! For a good cause.
Juxtapose Fantasy [website, art/fic] - Yaoi/slash fans - have you visited JuxtaposeFantasy yet?

Secrets Left to Post: 12 pages, 298 secrets from Secret Submission Post #079.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 129

[identity profile] haro.livejournal.com 2008-07-07 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not bullshit. Females have little trouble relating to a male lead, but males (at least boys) often have trouble with female leads.

That being said, exist to be a damsel in distress? I'm trying to think of a Pixar female that plays the role of damsel in distress and failing completely. Jessie, Atta, Dory, Elastigirl, Collette, Sally, Eve, etc. None of them. In all honesty, in many cases the female is really the stronger character.

It's certainly better than Disney. If the female is a lead she's a damsel in distress and just wants a guy. If she's not the lead... well same. Even their strong women are usually reduced to DiD in the end. There are some exceptions (hello Mulan and Pocahontas), but still.

Re: 129

[identity profile] militarypenguin.livejournal.com 2008-07-07 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Took the words right out of my mouth.
(deleted comment)

Re: 129

[identity profile] elyssadc.livejournal.com 2008-07-08 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Amen.

Re: 129

[identity profile] triestine.livejournal.com 2008-07-08 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Females have little trouble relating to a male lead, but males (at least boys) often have trouble with female leads.

I'm afraid this is true, however it's a learned (in)ability, not something that's natural. Perpetuating the omission of strong or leading female characters is what contributes to the problem.

Re: 129

[identity profile] haro.livejournal.com 2008-07-08 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
But keeping on topic, Pixar does not omit strong female characters at all from it's stories so ummm...?

Re: 129

[identity profile] triestine.livejournal.com 2008-07-08 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I'll take your word for it because I don't know which animated films are Pixar's, which are by Dreamworks, etc.; I was just replying to the general statement above.
ext_6545: (Default)

Re: 129

[identity profile] bunnymcfoo.livejournal.com 2008-07-09 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
The point is NOT that there aren't strong female characters. The point is that there are no strong lead characters; it's Wall-E, not Eve, Marlon was the main character, Dory was the sidekick. I could go on, but I'm hoping you see the point there.


Females should not always be the supporting cast, no matter how awesome those supporting characters are.

Re: 129

[identity profile] haro.livejournal.com 2008-07-09 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
It was discussed that we progressively introduce strong female characters that boys can like. They will NOT automatically accept a lead strong female if there aren't strong females on the side leading up to it. It has to be eased into. An d Pixar is planning a story with a female lead. It's called The Bear and the Bow and it comes out in a few years.

But that aside, to call it sexist is just SO ridiculous, I'm sorry. You can say you wish that Pixar would have a female lead and that is totally fine, but it is a HUGE stretch to call them sexist because they haven't especially since they continually write strong women (as noted, often stronger than the actual male leads), lead or not.
ext_6545: (gonna be a superstar someday)

Re: 129

[identity profile] bunnymcfoo.livejournal.com 2008-07-09 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
I do think it's sexist. I think that having to ease males into liking strong female characters is a sad commentary in and of itself that the entire system and the society that we live in is sexist.

Yeah, I saw that there's one coming out in um, three years. That's fabulous. It really is. But I think that having a lead female character in one film out of ten is a really really pathetic track record.

I don't wish that Pixar would have a female lead. My wishes are a bit more far reaching than that. I wish that every film that Pixar produces would have a fairly equal distribution of female and male characters. For instance, I wish that Ratatouille had more female chefs, and female rats. I wish that Cars had "female" race cars, that there had been a higher percentage of "female" vehicles in general, and that some of them had been trucks or more traditionally "masculine" vehicles.

I wish that for every film Pixar produces with a male lead, they would produce one with a female lead. I wish for equal and varied representation.

I guess that makes me ridiculous in your book. I'm okay with that. I'd rather be ridiculous and calling society on the generalized and specific gender issues that I see than be anything else. There wouldn't be any strong female characters if women hadn't started drawing attention to the issue, and I genuinely don't think that we as a society are anywhere near far enough towards gender equality for us to STOP drawing attention to it.
Edited 2008-07-09 02:32 (UTC)