[ SECRET POST #4053 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4053 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 16 secrets from Secret Submission Post #580.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It's hard to say because a lot of it depends on tone and genre. But I don't think it's ludicrous to have a reference to it or mention of it in conversation, or to talk about the prior relationship with Grindelwald in a way that addresses it, or something like that. Just for instance.

[(Anonymous)]

What you’re describing is implicit, and you don’t know there WON’T be some of that, if not in the next movie, then in the following 3.

All this jumping to the worst possible conclusion is what’s ludicrous.

[(Anonymous)]

What you’re describing is implicit,

how is him talking about being gay, or talking about his past gay love affair in a way that makes it clear that it's a gay love affair, "implicit"

[(Anonymous)]

Do you honestly think that would be in character for Dumbledore? Honestly?

[(Anonymous)]

I don't agree. Just because he didn't do it in the books doesn't mean he'd never do it.

[(Anonymous)]

YMMV but I can’t imagine it. Keeping secrets, especially about his past, was a cornerstone of his character.