[ SECRET POST #4054 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4054 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Spirited Away]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Death Comes to Pemberley]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The Detective, season 1]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #580.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Is internet vigilantism good or bad?

[morieris]

It's a tool, and sometimes people use the tool in a way that's too far.

I think it fills in a niche that 'IRL' law hasn't quite bridged yet in places - invading someone's personal cloud storage and spreading their nudes is not good, no matter if you like the person or not.

I have no sympathy for someone using discriminatory language and being exposed and losing something from it.

Re: Is internet vigilantism good or bad?

[(Anonymous)]

Honestly, I think 'vigilantism' is a misleading term to use from the beginning, because a lot of what we're talking about doesn't have much to do with the law in the first place. Publicizing someone using discriminatory language isn't vigilantism. It's not supplanting the law because it's not a legal thing in the first place, it's a speech thing.