case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-02-11 02:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #4057 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4057 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #581.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 09:05 am (UTC)(link)
OP, you are seriously misunderstanding "Choose Not to Warn." CNTW means that the author chooses not to warn. They don't have to have a reason for it. They're not doing it wrong, because it accurately conveys that they are choosing not to warn. There could be fluffy bunnies or underage noncon (or both). They're both equally valid uses of the tag. Wanting authors to add a warning tag to a CNTW fic is nonsensical, because the author has chosen not to warn, and demanding that they warn anyway sounds really entitled. You have no right to expect that authors will use CNTW purely for your convenience, to mean "stuff OP doesn't want to read."

I'm sympathetic to people who can't read certain content without bad emotional consequences, but it's up to everyone to manage their own reading experience. Continuing to read fic that's tagged CNTW when you know that some content will badly upset you is like Russian roulette, and I don't really understand why you're doing that.