Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-02-11 02:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #4057 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4057 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #581.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 06:59 pm (UTC)(link)Second, I don't see how it's "entitled". Can we please stop using that word here? As far as I can see, this is a discussion about the proper use of tags. It's no more entitled to have an opinion about how tags should be used than it is to have an opinion about the proper usage of a word.
Third: I don't expect that anyone will actually change the way that they tag fics. People are clearly invested in using the system this way, they clearly have various objections to the idea of tagging fics in a more discrete way, they're very committed to not using warnings, and none of that is likely to change at any point in the future. I'd prefer it if they did change, and I'm trying to articulate why that is and why I think it would be better if people didn't use it that way. And I would also hope that I can make it a little easier to understand where some of the other anons that you've apparently been arguing with have been coming from. But I don't expect any active change to come, which is why I've tried to stay out of the thread before my previous post, but it just seemed like there were a lot of crossed wires in the conversation.
I hope that helps clear some things up.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 08:15 pm (UTC)(link)I would like to say for the third time in this thread that the assumptions that you're making based on the belief that only one anon has disagreed with you in this thread are incorrect.
I don't expect that anyone else will change their behavior. I wish they would, and I think it would be a basically better system for everyone if they did, but I don't expect that they will.
I'm not even sure what else to say.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)It wouldn't be better for everyone. Certainly not for the people who dislike your ideas for an improved system, or the people who don't like using warnings.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)again, that's my belief, and I understand that people don't agree with me about it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)you are clearly the reasonable party in this conversation, can't dispute that
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-12 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)The other anon who replied to you was not me, and I don't know what their issue is.