case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-02-15 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #4061 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4061 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #581.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-16 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
I have a pretty high bar for suspecting fetish art. For example, last week I went to a museum [MONA, Hobart, Tasmania] where there was a room full of one guy's work, ALL of which involved either 1) small boys frolicking naked in the fields, or 2) small boys (still naked) being violently murdered by men in uniform.
That was *definitely* the artist's fetish.

This? I kind of doubt it.
dani_phantasma: (carousel)

[personal profile] dani_phantasma 2018-02-16 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
Holy crap ew. o.o That sounds super disturbing.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-16 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
Wait what the hell?

Man, like, either it was his fetish or he was plagued by some super disturbing trauma that he worked out through his paintings, but either way the exhibit sounds very disturbing. /shudder


As far as the actual thing... I don't always get the feeling it's the artist's fetish, but sometimes there's that sense. It's weird, the same basic thing can look completely innocent coming from one person, and give me the creeps coming from someone else, despite the fact that I would give the same literal description for both? Just a vibe thing, I guess.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-16 01:06 pm (UTC)(link)
da

Yeah, I'd say go with your gut.

TBH looking at that art, I find it appealing and well-drawn. Doesn't look particularly underage to me, but I don't know the character it was based on. (Looks like a twink in their 20s to me, depending on the art style!)

But often your gut knows what's up in these cases, and if you feel weird about someone's art, it's wise to listen and avoid, IMO. Same for many aspects of human interaction, from who you befriend, to dating, to money stuff

(Anonymous) 2018-02-16 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

if I'm not mistaken, OP, please correct me if I'm wrong, this seems to be a drawing of Jesse McCree from Overwatch as a kid. And when he joins Overwatch originally, he's supposed to be 17, and looks older than this, I would imagine. By the time you are in game with him, he's 37 and looks like this:
https://d1u5p3l4wpay3k.cloudfront.net/overwatch_gamepedia/thumb/d/d2/Mccree-portrait.png/264px-Mccree-portrait.png?version=dde76167adeda3da2c7b19b015821bf2

OP

(Anonymous) 2018-02-20 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)
it is McCree, yeah. I didn't find the art wierd untill I followed them on twitter and it turned out they only drew him exclusively as a little kid or teenager. there were like 2 arts where he was depicted as a mature man, but still younger than in canon. absolutely a bad vibe for me, somehow