case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-02-16 06:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #4062 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4062 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Danny Elfman]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________





















07. [SPOILERS for Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency Season 2]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for The Shape of Water]
[WARNING for discussion of rape/non-con]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #581.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: US politics thread

(Anonymous) 2018-02-17 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
My opinion hasn't changed. I knew the DOJ were full of crooks. But now we have proof.

Re: US politics thread

(Anonymous) 2018-02-17 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
We've always known that DOJ / FBI have been fairly crappy, yes, in a wide variety of ways (for instance, the Comey memo; also, the entire history of American law enforcement).

However, I don't think that the Nunes memo was a great noise in that regard, or what particular significance it had. And in the context of the Russia investigation, it didn't really provide any compelling defense against the allegations involved - for the most part, it didn't even actually try to do so. So what I don't quite see is how it could change someone's opinion on that particular investigation unless they were already enormously predisposed to have their opinion changed.