Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-03-16 06:30 pm
[ SECRET POST #4090 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4090 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Reylo]
__________________________________________________
03.

[black panther, martin freeman]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Colm Wilkinson and Philip Quast in Les Mis 10th anniversary concert]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Doug Jones]
__________________________________________________
06. https://i.imgur.com/UETD1MW.png
[linked for nudity]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #585.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-03-17 02:45 am (UTC)(link)What's a TTP, by the by?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-03-17 03:18 am (UTC)(link)Sorry. TTP stands for "Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-03-17 04:00 am (UTC)(link)It's heavily implied? What with the guy moving in and destroying cultural treasures and ripping at the heart of a peaceful country and fomenting war? And - I'm just going to say this again because it's a thing that happens in rl discourse after an atrocity - he *didn't* disown Killmonger. He didn't say "rogue agent" or "well of course the black guy would use this training irresponsibly" or #notallCIA. He was flat: "We taught him how to do this. This Thing of Darkness we acknowledge ours."
I don't know what to say, I think we're reading very different things into body language and dialogue.
(Thanks for the info.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-03-17 04:40 am (UTC)(link)I think probably that was the director's intention.
I guess my problem is that I think it should have been more explicit. In particular, it just feels like... in US media, just because you show something that's clearly evil being done by a security agency, it doesn't therefore follow that you're criticizing the institution. The depictions of those institutions in American media, and the elisions and moral double standards that they usually involve, are just so commonplace. It's dangerous to let something speak for itself in a context that's so distorted already. I just really think that's something that you need to be slightly more explicit about.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-03-17 02:35 pm (UTC)(link)This just seems like an echo of the kind of tabula rasa we aim for when meeting important people we still want to talk to us, but I have a lot of really complicated feelings about my service, so it's entirely possible I read the room wrong. *shrug*