case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-04-03 06:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #4108 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4108 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Korg from Thor: Ragnarok]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Knight Squad]


__________________________________________________



05.
(Yellow Diamond from Steven Universe, "What's the Use of Feeling Blue")


__________________________________________________



06.
(the cast from Altered Carbon)


__________________________________________________



07.
(Zimmy, Gunnerkrigg Court)














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #588.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
On one hand, there's a difference between posting "The ocean makes me feel small, but I'm okay with that" and posting "I think the ocean is full of salt water." But on the other hand, as long as you name your body of water, even an unoriginal secret will generate some discussion about favorite beaches and orcas vs sharks.

Now, if you're posting that you have vague, but controversial, feelings about certain ecosystems that must remain nameless less you incur the wrath of big name naturalists, you're just going to annoy people.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
Then those people can just scroll down to the next secret and not be jerks?

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
Or they can just stop coming to fandom secrets altogether, and then it really will be dead! That definitely makes more sense than actually discussing the secrets that are posted on fandom secrets, you weirdo.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
Discussion is great, but I'm not sure how telling someone their secret isn't good enough is productive or interesting. I'm also not seeing how skipping secrets you don't like (as opposed to being a jerk to the person who made it) is killing FS. This seems like a really silly overreaction.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
Be a jerk or avoid FS altogether aren't the only two options people have and it's weird you're suggesting otherwise. It's almost as if you want an excuse to be a jerk and framing it like it's an inevitable choice.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think posting to disagree with a secret is bad

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
Civil disagreement is great. Complaining that someone's secret isn't up to your personal standards is a dick move.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
I think it's much harder to distinguish between those two things than you seem to think.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
It really isn't.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
I honestly don't see what's so difficult about it.

"I disagree with this secret because reasons" vs "This secret is stupid and a waste of time. How is this even a secret?"

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt - Right? Like how is that distinction hard in any way?

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
What if I say 'I think most people actually agree with you' or 'I think that was actually the point of the movie'?

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 03:40 am (UTC)(link)
Neither of those is an outright complaint about the secret itself, so I'd count them in the civil discussion category.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
As long as those remarks don't come with the snotty implication of "... so why did you bother making this secret", that seems civil enough.