case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-04-06 06:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #4111 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4111 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________














06. [SPOILERS for Avengers Infinity War]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for incest]

[Crimson Peak]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #588.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-06 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Yet somehow there are many characters in Japanese media who have an explicitly specified gender.

I mean that when writers (not just Japanese writers) purposefully obscure a character's gender, they probably mean for the character's gender to be ambiguous and to be up to audience interpretation, and not just for the audience to assume as OP apparently does that an ambiguously gendered character is "really" a woman in disguise or whatever.
maximumhusky: blue sakura branches front of lantern (Default)

[personal profile] maximumhusky 2018-04-07 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
+1 this pretty much.